Skill

legalcode-ai-provisions-reviewer

Reviews contracts for AI-specific provisions: IP ownership of AI-generated outputs, AI usage restrictions and acceptable-use policies, training data rights (inputs/outputs as training material), liability allocation for AI errors and hallucinations, transparency and explainability requirements, algorithmic audit rights, bias monitoring and disparate impact obligations, human oversight and human-in-the-loop requirements, AI governance and responsible-AI clauses, and missing AI governance terms. Flags contracts that lack adequate AI safeguards, identifies one-sided AI risk transfers, generates redlines, and produces a confidence-scored, auditable AI governance analysis. Use when reviewing SaaS agreements, professional services contracts, technology licenses, vendor contracts, employment agreements, or any commercial contract where either party uses, deploys, procures, or integrates AI systems. Applies EU AI Act 2024/1689, GDPR Art. 22, NIST AI RMF, NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT), Colorado SB 205 (2024), US Copyright Office AI guidance (Jan 2025), and UK IP Office AI position. Jurisdiction-agnostic with [JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC] markers. Severity classification: GREEN / YELLOW / RED / [AI-GOVERNANCE-GAP].